MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
161 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4850 mm
4341 mm
1870 mm
1804 mm
1875 mm
1693 mm
2855 mm
2676 mm
235 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
80 L
50 L
/
17.2 Km/L
/
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
136 BHP - 190 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Diesel & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
3.0 L
1.6 L
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
115 BHP
450 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
MU X 3.0T AWD LS
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMU X 3.0T AWD LS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.