CarteaCompare CarsMU X 3.0T AWD LS vs G6 RWD Standard Range

MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs G6 RWD Standard Range Comparison

Car Information

/

435 km

/

66 kWh

Engine / Motor

/

200

Dimensions

7 Seater

5

4850 mm

4753

1870 mm

1920

1875 mm

1650

2855 mm

2890

235 L

571L (1,374L with rear seats folded)

/

2025

/

19

/

5

Fuel Economy

80 L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

10.2

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

Digital

/

Front Row Seats

/

Front Row Seats

/

Leather

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

7

/

/

/

Front and Rear

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.96

/

/

/

/

/

/

18

Battery/Charging

/

CCS2

/

20min = 10-80% SOC

/

215

/

7.5(5-100%)

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Rear Drive

/

Double Wishbone Independent Suspension

/

Rear Multi-link Independent Suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

/

Ventilated Braking Discs

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.0 L

/

136 BHP - 190 BHP

280 BHP - 470 BHP

Automatic & Manual

Automatic

Diesel & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 - 7

5

/

TBD

/

435 - 570

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

/

Diesel

Electric

190 BHP

280 BHP

450 Nm

/

Motor

/

440

/

1

/

175

/

LFP

/

Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor

/

210

/

280

Technologies

/

/

5

/

12

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MU X 3.0T AWD LS

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
  • G6 RWD Standard Range

    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Remote key types
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMU X 3.0T AWD LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about price; choose G6 RWD Standard Range if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while G6 RWD Standard Range has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while G6 RWD Standard Range has a wheelbase of 2890. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G6 RWD Standard Range, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while G6 RWD Standard Range uses Rear Drive.