MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs GS4 1.5T GB Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4850 mm
4545 mm
1870 mm
1856 mm
1875 mm
1668 mm
2855 mm
2680 mm
235 L
470 L
Fuel Economy
80 L
55 L
/
14.7 Km/L
/
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
1.5 L
136 BHP - 190 BHP
165 BHP
Automatic & Manual
TBD
Diesel & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
165 BHP
450 Nm
265 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
MU X 3.0T AWD LS
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
GS4 1.5T GB
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS4 1.5T GB
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about interior space; choose GS4 1.5T GB if you care more about power.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while GS4 1.5T GB has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while GS4 1.5T GB has a wheelbase of 2680 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while GS4 1.5T GB uses Front Wheel Drive.