MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs GX3 PRO GK Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
4850 mm
4005
1870 mm
1575
1875 mm
1760
2855 mm
2480
235 L
250
Fuel Economy
80 L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Front
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
Infotainment
/
3.5
/
2
Transmission
/
CVT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
205/60 R16
/
205/60 R16
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
1.5
136 BHP - 190 BHP
100 BHP - 102
Automatic & Manual
CVT
Diesel & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.5
Diesel
Gasoline
190 BHP
100 BHP
450 Nm
/
Technologies
/
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MU X 3.0T AWD LS
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
GX3 PRO GK
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Push Button Start
- Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
- Collision Safety Cut-Out
- Number of Airbags
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMU X 3.0T AWD LS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about price; choose GX3 PRO GK if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while GX3 PRO GK has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while GX3 PRO GK has a wheelbase of 2480. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while GX3 PRO GK uses Front Drive.