MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs LX Comfort 1.5T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

/

180 km/h

/

4

/

1498 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

4850 mm

4520 mm

1870 mm

1848 mm

1875 mm

1690 mm

2855 mm

2670 mm

235 L

400 L

/

5 Doors

/

200 m

Fuel Economy

80 L

51 L

/

15 Km/L

/

15 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

6

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.0 L

1.5 L - 1.6 L

136 BHP - 190 BHP

144 HP - 197 BHP

Automatic & Manual

7DCT & Automatic & CVT

Diesel & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

Engine

3.0 L

1.5 L

Diesel

Gasoline

190 BHP

156 BHP

450 Nm

230 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • MU X 3.0T AWD LS

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
  • LX Comfort 1.5T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMU X 3.0T AWD LS

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about price; choose LX Comfort 1.5T if you care more about power.

Popular Car Comparisons

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Haval | H2 1.5T Intelligent

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Hongqi | EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Sandstorm | Alreem 2.0T High Line (4x4)

Isuzu | MU X 3.0T AWD LS

VS

Geely | GS Sport 1.8L Classic

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while LX Comfort 1.5T has a fuel consumption of 6.67. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while LX Comfort 1.5T has a wheelbase of 2670 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while LX Comfort 1.5T uses Front Wheel Drive.