MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs AITO 9- 5 seater Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
4850 mm
5230
1870 mm
1999
1875 mm
1800
2855 mm
3110
235 L
/
/
22"
/
5
Fuel Economy
80 L
65L
/
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
16
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
Intelligent air suspension
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
1.5L
136 BHP - 190 BHP
489 - 496 hp
Automatic & Manual
AT
Diesel & Petrol
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
5
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Galaxy
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.5L
Diesel
Hybrid
190 BHP
496 hp
450 Nm
675Front:315/Rear:360
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Motor
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Technologies
/
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MU X 3.0T AWD LS
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
AITO 9- 5 seater
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about overall equipment; choose AITO 9- 5 seater if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AITO 9- 5 seater , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while AITO 9- 5 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive.