MU X 3.0T AWD LS vs V23 Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7 Seater
5
4850 mm
4220
1870 mm
1915
1875 mm
1845
2855 mm
2735
235 L
/
/
19
/
1613
/
1641
/
42
/
40
Fuel Economy
80 L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
7
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
/
255/55 R19
/
255/55 R19
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
/
136 BHP - 190 BHP
134
Automatic & Manual
AT
Diesel & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
7 - 7
5
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
3.0 L
/
Diesel
Electric
190 BHP
134
450 Nm
/
Motor
/
180
Comparison of configuration highlights
MU X 3.0T AWD LS
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
V23
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickV23
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MU X 3.0T AWD LS if you care more about interior space; choose V23 if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a fuel consumption of No data, while V23 has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T AWD LS has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while V23 has a wheelbase of 2735. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T AWD LS, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T AWD LS uses All Wheel Drive, while V23 uses No data.