MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) vs AITO 7 - 6 seater Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
7 Seater
6
4850 mm
5020
1870 mm
1945
1875 mm
1760
2855 mm
2820
235 L
/
/
21"
Fuel Economy
80 L
60
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
/
single-speed AT transmission
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.0 L
1.5L
136 BHP - 190 BHP
449 hp
Automatic & Manual
single-speed AT transmission
Diesel & Petrol
Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 7
6
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.0 L
1.5L
Diesel
Hybrid
190 BHP
449 hp
450 Nm
660Front：300/Rear：360
/
Turbocharge
/
330Front：130/Rear：200
Motor
/
330Front：130/Rear：200
Technologies
/
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
AITO 7 - 6 seater
- Welcome Light
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) if you care more about interior space; choose AITO 7 - 6 seater if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) has a fuel consumption of No data, while AITO 7 - 6 seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2855 mm, while AITO 7 - 6 seater has a wheelbase of 2820. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. MU X 3.0T Standard (4x2) uses Rear Wheel Drive, while AITO 7 - 6 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive.