Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 vs Challenger 3.6L GT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
250 km/h
200 km/h
8
/
5038 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
4
5 Seater
19
/
2 Doors
2 Doors
4784
5027 mm
2080
1923 mm
1391
1460 mm
2710
2950 mm
383 L
459 L
137
/
Fuel Economy
8.6 km/L(MT) | 9.2 km/L(AT)
9.8 Km/L
60 L
70 L
8.6 Km/L
9.8 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
12.4
/
Front Row Seats
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Cloth with Vinyl Trim Buckets
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
Bucket
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
12
/
Transmission
10 Speed AT / 6 Speed MT
/
Chassis & Steering
Magne Ride Damping System
/
Rear Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
MacPherson-Strut Double Ball-Joint
/
Independent Integral-Link
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Brembo
/
255/40 R19
/
275/40 R19
/
Key Spec
2.3 L - 5.2 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
300 BHP - 760 BHP
300 BHP - 797 BHP
10 Speed AT / 6 Speed MT & Automatic & Manual
Automatic & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 4
2 Seater - 5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
5.0
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
5.0L Ti-VCT V8 (4th Gen)
/
4
/
486 BHP
305 BHP
567 Nm
363 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Normal, Sport, Slippery, Track, Drag Strip, Custom Mode
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mustang 2025 GT 5.0
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Keyless Start
- Heater
- Rear Camera
- Headlight On Reminder
- Remote key types
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
- Driver Seat Belt Warning
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
- Passive Pedestrian Protection
- Child Lock
- Speed Alert
- Active braking
Challenger 3.6L GT
- Rear Camera
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and amazing acceleration
- Classic and bold exterior design
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Difficulty with control and low flexibility
- Lack of Intelligent Systems Technologies
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 if you care more about overall equipment; choose Challenger 3.6L GT if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 has a fuel consumption of 11.63, while Challenger 3.6L GT has a fuel consumption of 10.2. Therefore, Challenger 3.6L GT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 has a wheelbase of 2710, while Challenger 3.6L GT has a wheelbase of 2950 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Challenger 3.6L GT, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mustang 2025 GT 5.0 uses Rear Drive, while Challenger 3.6L GT uses Rear Wheel Drive.