Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4712
4490 mm
1881
1874 mm
1597
1613 mm
2984
2750 mm
100+402
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
370
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
DHT
/
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
TBD
TBD
255 BHP - 487
153 BHP - 305 BHP
AT & DHT
TBD
Electric
Electric
TBD
TBD
5
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
/
/
Electric
Electric
255 BHP
153 BHP
415
340 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select has a wheelbase of 2984, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Mustang Mach-E 2025 Select uses Rear Drive, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.