N9 PHEV vs EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
160 km/h
Dimensions
7
5 Seater
5,258
4490 mm
2,030
1874 mm
1,830
1613 mm
3,125
2750 mm
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic (E-CVT)
/
Chassis & Steering
/
All Wheel Drive
Engine
2.0 L
/
Hybrid
Electric
207 - 925
305 BHP
325 - 1,035
680 Nm
Motor
1,035
/
Key Spec
/
TBD
/
153 BHP - 305 BHP
/
TBD
/
Electric
/
TBD
/
5 Seater
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
N9 PHEV
EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose N9 PHEV if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, N9 PHEV has a fuel consumption of No data, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, N9 PHEV has a wheelbase of 3,125, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, N9 PHEV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. N9 PHEV uses No data, while EHS3 EV 305 hp (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.