NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo vs Fengon ix5 Comfortline Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
180 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4869 mm
4685 mm
1850 mm
1865 mm
1440 mm
1645 mm
2825 mm
2790 mm
517 L
347 L
Fuel Economy
61 L
58 L
11 Km/L
12 Km/L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
Remote keyless entry w/ push button ignition
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
Intelligent Lane Intervention
/
✓
/
Intelligent Forward Collision Warning
/
Blind Spot Warning
/
Rear Parking Sensors
/
✓
✓
Lane Departure Warning
/
Intelligent Lane Intervention
/
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
Transmission
Paddle shifters with manual shift mode
/
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
1.5 L
179 BHP - 270 BHP
145 BHP
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
TBD
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Chrome V-Motion grille
/
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5 L
Petrol
Gasoline
(VC-Turbo) DOHC
/
248 BHP
145 BHP
248hp @ 5600 rpm
/
380 Nm
230 Nm
380 Nm @ 4000 rpm
/
Direct Injection Gasoline (DIG)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo
- Keyless Entry
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Fengon ix5 Comfortline
- Rear Defogger
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- ABS
- Child Lock
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo if you care more about interior space; choose Fengon ix5 Comfortline if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo has a fuel consumption of No data, while Fengon ix5 Comfortline has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo has a wheelbase of 2825 mm , while Fengon ix5 Comfortline has a wheelbase of 2790 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive , while Fengon ix5 Comfortline uses Front Wheel Drive.