NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo vs Mage E1 Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
220 km/h
190
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5 Doors
/
4869 mm
4650
1850 mm
1905
1440 mm
1630
2825 mm
2775
517 L
/
/
1480
/
19
Fuel Economy
61 L
51
11 Km/L
/
/
15.8
Comfort
Remote keyless entry w/ push button ignition
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Intelligent Lane Intervention
/
✓
/
Intelligent Forward Collision Warning
✓
Blind Spot Warning
✓
Rear Parking Sensors
/
✓
✓
Lane Departure Warning
/
Intelligent Lane Intervention
/
/
✓
/
4
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
13.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
Paddle shifters with manual shift mode
/
CVT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
235/55 R19
/
235/55 R19
Key Spec
2.0 L - 3.5 L
1.5
179 BHP - 270 BHP
202 BHP
Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual
7AT & AT
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Chrome V-Motion grille
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
1.5
Petrol
Gasoline
(VC-Turbo) DOHC
/
248 BHP
202 BHP
248hp @ 5600 rpm
/
380 Nm
305
380 Nm @ 4000 rpm
/
Direct Injection Gasoline (DIG)
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo
- Keyless Entry
- Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK）
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
- Lane Departure Warning
- Lane Keeping Assist
Mage E1
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo if you care more about interior space; choose Mage E1 if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo has a fuel consumption of No data, while Mage E1 has a fuel consumption of 6.33. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo has a wheelbase of 2825 mm , while Mage E1 has a wheelbase of 2775. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive , while Mage E1 uses Front Drive.