NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo vs RD6 73kwh Air Comparison

Car Information

/

424

/

73

Engine / Motor

220 km/h

/

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

5 Doors

/

4869 mm

/

1850 mm

/

1440 mm

/

2825 mm

/

517 L

/

/

18

Fuel Economy

61 L

/

11 Km/L

/

Comfort

Remote keyless entry w/ push button ignition

/

/

/

Smart Key

Interior

/

/

Driver Seat

/

10.2

/

/

/

Leather

Safety

Intelligent Lane Intervention

/

/

Intelligent Forward Collision Warning

/

Blind Spot Warning

/

Rear Parking Sensors

/

Lane Departure Warning

/

Intelligent Lane Intervention

/

/

4

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

14.6

/

/

/

/

6

Transmission

Paddle shifters with manual shift mode

/

CVT

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.0 L - 3.5 L

/

179 BHP - 270 BHP

422

Automatic & CVT & CVTS & Manual

AT

Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater - 5 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Chrome V-Motion grille

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

/

Petrol

Electric

(VC-Turbo) DOHC

/

248 BHP

422

248hp @ 5600 rpm

/

380 Nm

/

380 Nm @ 4000 rpm

/

Direct Injection Gasoline (DIG)

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Motor

/

585

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo

    • Keyless Entry
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
  • RD6 73kwh Air

    • Keyless Entry
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Remote key types
    • Number of Airbags
    • Intelligent Emergency Call
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Excellent driving comfort
  • Economical fuel efficiency
  • Advanced security systems

Negative

  • Average motive power performance
  • Improvement of internal materials
  • Noise insulation needs to be developed

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickRD6 73kwh Air

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo if you care more about overall equipment; choose RD6 73kwh Air if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo

VS

Honda | Accord 1.5L EXL

Nissan | NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo

VS

Toyota | Toyota Avalon 2021 3.5L V6 SE+

Nissan | NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo

VS

Toyota | Toyota Avalon 2019 3.5L V6 SE+

Nissan | NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo

VS

Toyota | Toyota Avalon 2022 3.5L V6 XLE

Nissan | NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo

VS

Honda | 1.5L Accord 2025 EXL

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo has a fuel consumption of No data, while RD6 73kwh Air has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo has a wheelbase of 2825 mm , while RD6 73kwh Air has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. NISSAN ALTIMA SL 2.0 VC-Turbo uses Front Wheel Drive , while RD6 73kwh Air uses Four-Wheel Drive.