Nissan GT-R 2024 Track Edition vs McLaren 540C 2017 3.8T Coupe Comparison
Car Information
2.8
/
Engine / Motor
350
320
6
8
Dimensions
4 Seater
2 Seater
4690
4530
1895
2095
1370
1202
2780
2670
249
144
Fuel Economy
8.5
9.3
72
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
✓
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
✓
✓
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Key Spec
3.8 L
3.8 L
485 BHP - 600 BHP
533 BHP
Automatic & Manual
Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
2 Seater - 4 Seater
2 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.8 L
3.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
600 BHP
533 BHP
652
540
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan GT-R 2024 Track Edition
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Seats - Comfort
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Rollover stability control
- Runflat Tyres
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- First Aid Kit
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
McLaren 540C 2017 3.8T Coupe
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Acceleration Skid Control
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance, suitable for high acceleration
- Excellent control and stability when driving fast
- Bold and attractive exterior design
Negative
- Purchase and maintenance costs are high
- Relatively poor fuel economy
- Ride comfort is limited by suspension stiffness
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMcLaren 540C 2017 3.8T Coupe
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan GT-R 2024 Track Edition if you care more about interior space; choose McLaren 540C 2017 3.8T Coupe if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan GT-R 2024 Track Edition has a fuel consumption of 11.76, while McLaren 540C 2017 3.8T Coupe has a fuel consumption of 10.75. Therefore, McLaren 540C 2017 3.8T Coupe is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan GT-R 2024 Track Edition has a wheelbase of 2780, while McLaren 540C 2017 3.8T Coupe has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan GT-R 2024 Track Edition, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan GT-R 2024 Track Edition uses All Wheel Drive, while McLaren 540C 2017 3.8T Coupe uses Rear Wheel Drive.