Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S vs 2008 GT Comparison

Car Information

11.5

8.2

Engine / Motor

180

/

4

3

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4295

4300

1760

1987

1590

1550

2620

/

432

545

/

17

Fuel Economy

15.4

16.8

41

44

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

10

/

Transmission

/

Automatic

AT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

1.6 L - 2.0 L

0.0 L - 1199 L

118 BHP - 142 BHP

110 BHP - 155 BHP

Automatic & CVT

AT & Automatic

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Diesel & Electric & Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 Seater - 5 Seater

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.6 L

1.2

Gasoline

Gasoline

118 BHP

130

149

230

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Active Bonnet
    • Collision Detection
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
  • 2008 GT

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Modern and trend compliant design
  • High fuel economy for efficiency
  • Effective use of internal space

Negative

  • Engine performance is limited
  • Slow transmission response
  • The quality of interior materials is average

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickNissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S if you care more about price; choose 2008 GT if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S

VS

Opel | Opel Crossland X 2020 1.2T Innovation

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2021 1.6L (115HP) Active+

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S

VS

Dongfeng | AX7 E1

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S

VS

Peugeot | Peugeot 2008 2024 1.6L Active+ (115HP)

Nissan | Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX3 2020 2.0L GT (FWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while 2008 GT has a fuel consumption of 5.95. Therefore, 2008 GT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S has a wheelbase of 2620, while 2008 GT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 S uses Front Wheel Drive, while 2008 GT uses Front Drive.