Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
11.5
/
Engine / Motor
180
210
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4295
4.574
1760
1.876
1590
1.685
2620
2.720
432
463
Fuel Economy
15.4
12.2
41
55
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
✓
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Key Spec
1.6 L - 2.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
118 BHP - 142 BHP
127 - 231
Automatic & CVT
9AT & Automatic & DCT
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 5 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
118 BHP
231 BHP
149
360
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear Defogger
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Rear AC Controls
- Temperature Display
- Rear Camera
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Speed Limiter
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickNissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV if you care more about price; choose MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV has a fuel consumption of 6.49, while MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort has a fuel consumption of 8.2. Therefore, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV has a wheelbase of 2620, while MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort has a wheelbase of 2.720. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SV uses Front Wheel Drive, while MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort uses Front Wheel Drive.