Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs Grand Highlander Limited Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

200 km/h

6

/

Dimensions

8

7 Seater

5046

5116 mm

1975

1989 mm

1795

1781 mm

2900

2964 mm

470

1639 L

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

9.4

9 Km/L

74

85 L

/

9 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9AT

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

3.5 L

2.4 L

254 BHP - 271 BHP

266 BHP

9AT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

2.4 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

266 BHP

271 @ 6,400

/

340

420 Nm

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Grand Highlander Limited

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about price; choose Grand Highlander Limited if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (FWD) Smart Plus

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Nissan | Nissan Pathfinder 2020 3.5L S 4WD

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Toyota | Highlander GLE HEV 4X4

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2021 4.0L VX2 (4X4)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac XT4 2020 2.0T Luxury (FWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Grand Highlander Limited has a fuel consumption of 11.11. Therefore, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Grand Highlander Limited has a wheelbase of 2964 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Highlander Limited, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Grand Highlander Limited uses All Wheel Drive.