Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
200 km/h
6
/
Dimensions
8
7 Seater
5046
4980 mm
1975
1950 mm
1795
1780 mm
2900
2920 mm
470
/
Fuel Economy
9.4
12 Km/L
74
66 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
9AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
250 BHP - 271 BHP
248 BHP - 332 BHP
9AT & Automatic & CVT
8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 8
7 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
248 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
400 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
GS8 2.0T GT (4WD)
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickGS8 2.0T GT (4WD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about power; choose GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS8 2.0T GT (4WD), offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive.