Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

200 km/h

6

/

Dimensions

8

7 Seater

5046

4980 mm

1975

1950 mm

1795

1780 mm

2900

2920 mm

470

/

Fuel Economy

9.4

12 Km/L

74

66 L

/

12 Km/L

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

Interior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Safety

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

Infotainment

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Transmission

9AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

✓

/

✓

/

Key Spec

3.5 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

254 BHP - 271 BHP

248 BHP - 332 BHP

9AT & Automatic & CVT

8-Speed Automatic & 8AT & Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

7 - 7

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

✓

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

✓

Engine

3.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

248 BHP

271 @ 6,400

/

340

400 Nm

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • GS8 2.0T GT (4WD)

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickGS8 2.0T GT (4WD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about power; choose GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2021 4.0L XE

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol 2020 4.0L XE

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Corsair 2023 2.0T Premier Luxury

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Ford | Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop S-DLX Gas - 5 Doors 4x4 AT-copy

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) has a fuel consumption of 8.33. Therefore, GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) has a wheelbase of 2920 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, GS8 2.0T GT (4WD), offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while GS8 2.0T GT (4WD) uses Four Wheel Drive.