Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs Land Cruiser Hardtop S-DLX Gas - 5 Doors 4x4 AT-copy Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

/

6

6

Dimensions

8

5

5046

4970

1975

1800

1795

2180

2900

2730

470

/

/

16

Fuel Economy

9.4

8

74

130

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver And Front Passenger

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

9

/

/

2

Transmission

9AT

6 Speed Automatic Transmission

/

Front And Rear

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Drum

/

265/70R16C

/

265/70R16C

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

-

250 BHP - 271 BHP

201 - 228

9AT & Automatic & CVT

5 Speed Manual Transmission & 6 Speed Automatic Transmission

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

4.0

Gasoline

Gasoline

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

228

271 @ 6,400

/

340

360

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Land Cruiser Hardtop S-DLX Gas - 5 Doors 4x4 AT-copy

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Cool Box
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser Hardtop S-DLX Gas - 5 Doors 4x4 AT-copy if you care more about overall equipment.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Exeed | RX Luxury 2.0T

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

GAC | GS8 2.0T GT (4WD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Santa Fe 2022 3.5L GLS Premium+ (AWD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Dodge | Durango GT Premium 3.6L V6

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Jeep | Jeep Grand Cherokee 2019 3.6L Limited

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Land Cruiser Hardtop S-DLX Gas - 5 Doors 4x4 AT-copy has a fuel consumption of 12.5. Therefore, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Land Cruiser Hardtop S-DLX Gas - 5 Doors 4x4 AT-copy has a wheelbase of 2730. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser Hardtop S-DLX Gas - 5 Doors 4x4 AT-copy uses Four-Wheel Drive.