Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs Highlander GLE HEV 4x4 Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

/

6

4

Dimensions

8

7

5046

4950

1975

1930

1795

1730

2900

/

470

/

/

18

Fuel Economy

9.4

20.1

74

65

Comfort

/

/

/

Driver And Front Passenger

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver Seat

/

7

/

/

Driver Seat

/

Fabric

/

/

/

Second row

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver & Front Passenger + Knee + Side + Curtain

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

8

/

/

6

Transmission

9AT

Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

235/65 R18

/

235/65 R18

Key Spec

3.5 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

254 BHP - 271 BHP

240 - 240

9AT & Automatic & CVT

CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

2.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

240

271 @ 6,400

/

340

/

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Highlander GLE HEV 4x4

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Keyless Entry
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • ABS
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about price; choose Highlander GLE HEV 4x4 if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac XT5 2020 2.0T Luxury

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Toyota | Grand Highlander Limited

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Nissan | Nissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Toyota | Highlander GLE HEV 4x4

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Highlander GLE HEV 4x4 has a fuel consumption of 4.98. Therefore, Highlander GLE HEV 4x4 is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Highlander GLE HEV 4x4 has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Highlander GLE HEV 4x4 uses Four-Wheel Drive.