Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
4
Dimensions
8
5
5046
4330
1975
1800
1795
1955
2900
2310
470
/
/
16
Fuel Economy
9.4
11.7
74
90
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
Driver And Front Passenger
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
9
/
✓
/
2
Transmission
9AT
6 Speed Automatic Transmission
/
Front And Rear
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Drum
/
225/95R16C
/
225/95R16C
Key Spec
3.5 L
-
254 BHP - 271 BHP
201 - 228
9AT & Automatic & CVT
5 Speed Manual Transmission & 6 Speed Automatic Transmission
Gasoline & Petrol
Diesel & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
7 - 8
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
2.8
Gasoline
Diesel
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
201
271 @ 6,400
/
340
500
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Number of Airbags
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about price; choose Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT has a fuel consumption of 8.55. Therefore, Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT has a wheelbase of 2310. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT uses Four-Wheel Drive.