Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

/

6

4

Dimensions

8

5

5046

4330

1975

1800

1795

1955

2900

2310

470

/

/

16

Fuel Economy

9.4

11.7

74

90

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Fabric

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Driver And Front Passenger

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

9

/

/

2

Transmission

9AT

6 Speed Automatic Transmission

/

Front And Rear

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Drum

/

225/95R16C

/

225/95R16C

Key Spec

3.5 L - 3498 L

-

254 BHP - 271 BHP

201 - 228

9AT & Automatic

5 Speed Manual Transmission & 6 Speed Automatic Transmission

Gasoline & Petrol

Diesel & Gasoline

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

2.8

Gasoline

Diesel

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

201

271 @ 6,400

/

340

500

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

    • Electronic Engine Immobilizer
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Number of Airbags
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickLand Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

GAC | GS8 2.0T GT (4WD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2022 Base

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Porsche | Porsche Cayenne Coupe 2021 Base

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Toyota | Highlander GLE HEV 4X4

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Tank | Tank 300 2025 2.0T Conqueror

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT has a fuel consumption of 8.55. Therefore, Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT has a wheelbase of 2310. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT uses Four-Wheel Drive.