Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs Other Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

/

6

/

Dimensions

8

/

5046

/

1975

/

1795

/

2900

/

470

/

Fuel Economy

9.4

/

74

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

3.5 L

/

254 BHP - 271 BHP

/

9AT & Automatic & CVT

/

Gasoline & Petrol

/

TBD

/

7 - 8

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

/

Gasoline

/

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

/

271 @ 6,400

/

340

/

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Other

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
    • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
    • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

    Negative

    • Medium fuel economy
    • Traditional interior design needs updating
    • Noticeable noise during high speeds

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickOther

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about overall equipment; choose Other if you care more about overall equipment.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    Cadillac | Cadillac XT5 2020 2.0T Luxury

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    Toyota | Grand Highlander Limited

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    Nissan | Nissan Patrol Safari 2024 Safari M/T

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    Toyota | Land Cruiser Hardtop DLX DSL - 3 Doors 4x4 AT

    Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    VS

    Toyota | Highlander GLE HEV 4x4

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Other has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Other has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Other uses No data.