Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD vs Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

200 km/h

6

/

Dimensions

8

7 Seater

5046

4709 mm

1975

1897 mm

1795

1745 mm

2900

2705 mm

470

331 L

Fuel Economy

9.4

14.7 Km/L

74

55 L

/

14.7 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

9AT

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

3.5 L

2.4 L - 3.0 L

254 BHP - 271 BHP

165 BHP - 236 BHP

9AT & Automatic

Automatic & CVT

Gasoline & Petrol

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

5 Seater - 7 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

181 BHP

271 @ 6,400

/

340

245 Nm

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Push Button Start
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Integrated specifications
  • Competitive price value

Negative

  • Engine performance is moderate
  • Limited driving experience
  • Traditional interior design

Related comparisons

Editor's PickOutlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD if you care more about interior space; choose Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Palisade 2022 3.8L GDi (FWD) Smart Plus

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Nissan | Nissan Pathfinder 2020 3.5L S 4WD

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Toyota | Highlander GLE HEV 4X4

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 2021 4.0L VX2 (4X4)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD

VS

Cadillac | Cadillac XT4 2020 2.0T Luxury (FWD)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a fuel consumption of 6.8. Therefore, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a wheelbase of 2705 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD , offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L S 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line uses Front Wheel Drive.