Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD vs Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
185
6
N/A
Dimensions
8
8 Seater
5046
5.233
1975
2.024
1795
1.960
2900
3.022
470
528
/
✓
Fuel Economy
9.4
9.1
74
106
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
✓
✓
✓
Key Spec
3.5 L
3.5 L - 5.4 L
254 BHP - 271 BHP
300 BHP - 440
9AT & Automatic & CVT
10-Speed Selectshift Automatic & 10-Speed SelectshifteAutomatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8
6 Seater - 8
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
385 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
629
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree Camera
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Rollover stability control
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Bonnet
- Collision Detection
- Speed Limiter
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Excellent towing ability
- Comfort and ride quality
Negative
- Fuel consumption is high
- Large size may cause difficulty in maneuvering
- The initial purchase price is high
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL has a wheelbase of 3.022. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Nissan Pathfinder 3.5L S 4WD uses All Wheel Drive, while Ford Expedition 2024 3.5L EcoBoost XL uses All Wheel Drive.