Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) vs EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters Comparison

Car Information

8.0

6.5

/

160+160

/

≥400

Engine / Motor

190

/

6

N/A, Electric

Dimensions

7

7 Seater

5046

5209

1975

2010

1795

1731

2900

3110

470

/

Fuel Economy

9.4

/

74

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Key Spec

3.5 L

/

254 BHP - 271 BHP

429 BHP - 543 BHP

9AT & Automatic

Automatic

Gasoline & Petrol

Electric

TBD

/

7 - 8

4 Seater - 7 Seater

/

TBD

/

320 km

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

0.0 L

Gasoline

Electric

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

429 BHP

271 @ 6,400

/

340

600

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Collision Detection
    • Blind Spot Warning
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) if you care more about price; choose EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS7 2023 3.0T Luxury (AWD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Suburban 2019 5.3L LT 2WD

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Hongqi | Hongqi HS7 2022 3.0T Luxury (AWD)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Ford | Ford Expedition 2023 3.5T EcoBoost XLT - Leather (4X2)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater)

VS

Chevrolet | Chevrolet Tahoe 2022 5.3L LS 4WD

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) has a wheelbase of 2900, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SL 4WD (7 Seater) uses All Wheel Drive, while EHS9 Comfort 7 Seaters uses All Wheel Drive.