Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD vs Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
190 km/h
6
6
Dimensions
8
7
5046
4828 mm
1975
1943 mm
1795
1792 mm
2900
2916 mm
470
782 L
/
5 Doors
Fuel Economy
9.4
/
74
23 Gallon/ 87L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Smart Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
2nd Row Manual 60:40 Split
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Collision Mitigation Braking System (CMBS)
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Blind Spot Information System
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
3.6 L - 6.4 L
250 BHP - 271 BHP
286 BHP - 707 BHP
9AT & Automatic & CVT
8AT & Automatic
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5 - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
Black
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
3.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
V6 9AT
3.6L V6
271 BHP
293 BHP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
350 Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- Push Button Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- Rear Cross Traffic Alert
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- Versatility of options for powerful engines
- Impressive off-road driving capabilities
- High-end interior, equipped with modern technologies
Negative
- High fuel consumption for some models
- High price compared to some competitors
- Large size, difficult to maneuver in confined spaces
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD if you care more about price; choose Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo has a wheelbase of 2916 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive, while Grand Cherokee 3.6L Laredo uses All Wheel Drive.