Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD vs BYD Ti7 Design Comparison

Car Information

8.0

5.3

/

80

/

26.6

Engine / Motor

190

190

6

/

Dimensions

8

5

5046

5016

1975

1995

1795

1865

2900

2920

470

1800L

/

2425

/

19"

/

5.7

/

190

/

24

/

25

Fuel Economy

9.4

/

74

60

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

Front Row Seats

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Front Row Seats

/

All Seats

/

PU

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

54

/

6.6

Transmission

Automatic

AT

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

AWD

/

Double wishbone type

/

Five-link

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

Ventilated

/

Ventilated

/

60 /255 R19

/

60 /255 R19

Key Spec

2.5 L - 3.5 L

1.5T / PHEV

250 BHP - 271 BHP

480

9AT & Automatic & CVT

AT

Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 8 Seater

5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

1.5T / PHEV

Gasoline

Hybrid

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

480

271 @ 6,400

/

340

630

340 @ 4,800

/

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Sport / Normal / Eco

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • BYD Ti7 Design

    • Power Tailgate
    • Keyless Entry
    • Keyless Start
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder
    • Remote Central Door Locking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickBYD Ti7 Design

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD if you care more about overall equipment; choose BYD Ti7 Design if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

Jeep | Gladiator Sport 3.6L

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

Jeep | Jeep Gladiator 2024 3.6L Sport (4x4)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

Jeep | Jeep Gladiator 2021 3.6L Overland (4x4)

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

Tank | Tank 500 Prestige 2.0T

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

Lincoln | Lincoln Nautilus 2021 2.0T (250 Hp)

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while BYD Ti7 Design has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while BYD Ti7 Design has a wheelbase of 2920. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, BYD Ti7 Design, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD uses All Wheel Drive, while BYD Ti7 Design uses Four-Wheel Drive.