Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD vs ET BEV Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
/
Dimensions
8
5
5046
4980
1975
1975
1795
1694
2900
3000
470
/
/
21"
Fuel Economy
9.4
19.8 kWh/100km
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
4-direction electric
/
NFC
/
✓
Interior
✓
Driver Seat
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front & Back Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
front seats
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
Battery/Charging
/
10 min/ 20-80%
Transmission
Automatic
AT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
✓ + CDC
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
TBD
250 BHP - 271 BHP
473HP
9AT & Automatic & CVT
AT
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
7 - 8 Seater
5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
473HP
271 @ 6,400
/
340
660Nm
340 @ 4,800
/
/
353kw
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
L2 ADAS
/
Front & Rear
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
2
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
ET BEV
- Power Tailgate
- Keyless Entry
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Steering Adjustment
- Driving Recorder
- Intelligent Emergency Call
- Knee Bag - Driver
- Crash Auto Door Unlock
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Child Lock
- Seat belt reminder
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD if you care more about price; choose ET BEV if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while ET BEV has a fuel consumption of 5.05. Therefore, ET BEV is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while ET BEV has a wheelbase of 3000. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, ET BEV, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD uses All Wheel Drive, while ET BEV uses Four-Wheel Drive.