Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD vs Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) Comparison

Car Information

8.0

/

Engine / Motor

190

/

6

4

/

GCC

Dimensions

8

7 Seater

5046

4950 mm

1975

1930 mm

1795

1730 mm

2900

2850 mm

470

/

/

5 Doors

Fuel Economy

9.4

20 Km/L

74

65 L

/

20 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

Automatic

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

/

All Wheel Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

Key Spec

3.5 L - 3498 L

2.5 L - 2.5 L

254 BHP - 271 BHP

240 - 240

9AT & Automatic

CVT & Electronically controlled Continuously Variable Transmission (ECVT)

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 8

7 - 7

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

3.5 L

2.5 L

Gasoline

Hybrid

V6 9AT

/

271 BHP

240 BHP

271 @ 6,400

/

340

237 Nm

340 @ 4,800

/

/

In-Line

/

None

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Push Button Start
    • Welcome Light
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Collision Detection
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Active braking
  • Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

    • Rear Camera

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space and flexible storage
  • Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
  • Comprehensive and advanced security equipment

Negative

  • Medium fuel economy
  • Traditional interior design needs updating
  • Noticeable noise during high speeds

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickHighlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD if you care more about interior space; choose Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

Omoda | C5 TECH 1.5L

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

SERES | 5 2WD Standard

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

SERES | 5 4WD Premium

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

Exeed | TXL Comfort 1.6T

Nissan | Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD

VS

Exeed | LX Flagship 1.6T

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a fuel consumption of 5. Therefore, Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) has a wheelbase of 2850 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD uses All Wheel Drive, while Highlander 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD) uses All Wheel Drive.