Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD vs Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD Comparison
Car Information
SUV
/
8.0
/
Engine / Motor
190
/
6
/
Dimensions
8
/
5046
/
1975
/
1795
/
2900
/
470
/
Fuel Economy
9.4
/
74
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
All Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.5 L
/
250 BHP - 271 BHP
/
9AT & Automatic & CVT
/
Petrol & Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
/
TBD
/
7 - 8 Seater
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.5 L
/
Gasoline
/
V6 9AT
/
271 BHP
/
271 @ 6,400
/
340
/
340 @ 4,800
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD
- Electronic engine immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree camera
- Push Button Start
- Welcome Light
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Door Reflectors
- Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Collision Detection
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD if you care more about overall equipment; choose Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64, while Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a fuel consumption of 10.64. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a wheelbase of 2900, while Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD has a wheelbase of 2900. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD uses All Wheel Drive, while Pathfinder 3.5L SV 4WD uses All Wheel Drive.