OCTA vs AITO 9- 5 seater Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
5,018
5230
2,105
1999
1,995
1800
3,023
3110
/
22"
/
5
Fuel Economy
7.6Km/L
/
/
65L
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
15.6
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
16
/
✓
/
✓
/
23
Transmission
8-speed ZF automatic transmission
AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Intelligent air suspension
/
Four-Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5 L
1.5L
300 BHP - 635
489 - 496 hp
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 8 Seater
5
Engine
4.4L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
635
496 hp
750 Nm
675Front:315/Rear:360
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Exterior
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Galaxy
/
✓
Motor
/
365Front:165/Rear:200
Technologies
/
192 Laser LiDRA + 3 Millimeter-wave radar
/
12 Ultrasonic radar + 7 High perception camera + 4 Surround view camera
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
OCTA
AITO 9- 5 seater
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose OCTA if you care more about overall equipment; choose AITO 9- 5 seater if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, OCTA has a fuel consumption of 13.16, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, OCTA has a wheelbase of 3,023, while AITO 9- 5 seater has a wheelbase of 3110. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, AITO 9- 5 seater , offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. OCTA uses No data, while AITO 9- 5 seater uses Four-Wheel Drive.