OCTA vs Max RS Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
5,018
4785
2,105
1930
1,995
1625
3,023
2880
/
20"
Fuel Economy
7.6Km/L
/
/
56
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.2
/
Front and Back Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
19
Transmission
8-speed ZF automatic transmission
single-speed AT
Chassis & Steering
/
Four-Wheel Drive
/
double wishbone suspension
/
multi-link suspension
Key Spec
2.0 L - 5 L
1.5L
300 BHP - 635
496 hp
8-speed ZF automatic transmission & Automatic
AT & single-speed AT
Gasoline
Electric & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 8 Seater
5
Engine
4.4L
1.5L
Gasoline
Hybrid
635
496 hp
750 Nm
675
/
Turbocharge
/
365
Exterior
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
OCTA
Max RS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Superior off-road capability
- Luxurious and durable interior design
- Multiple options for powerful engines
Negative
- High price compared to competitors
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- A bit complicated infotainment system
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMax RS
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose OCTA if you care more about interior space; choose Max RS if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, OCTA has a fuel consumption of 13.16, while Max RS has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, OCTA has a wheelbase of 3,023, while Max RS has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, OCTA, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. OCTA uses No data, while Max RS uses Four-Wheel Drive.