Okavango 2025 GK vs G318 Standard Comparison

Car Information

/

220

Engine / Motor

180 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

/

Dimensions

7

5

19

/

5 Doors

/

4860 mm

5010

1910 mm

1985

1770 mm

1895

2825 mm

2880

257 L

/

194 mm

/

Fuel Economy

10 Km/L

16.3

52 L

/

10 Km/L

/

Comfort

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Smart Entry

/

✓

/

Interior

Driver Seat

/

3.5

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

PVC Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

/

/

✓

/

Safety

✓

/

✓

/

4

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Infotainment

12.3

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Android LCD

/

✓

/

6

/

Transmission

7DCT

DHT

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

/

Key Spec

1.5 L - 1.5 L

1.5

190 BHP - 218

252 BHP

7DCT & Automatic

DHT

Gasoline & Petrol

Hybrid

TBD

TBD

7 - 7

5

Exterior

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

LED

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Engine

In-Line

/

2.0

1.5

Gasoline

Hybrid

Single Turbo

/

4

/

218

252 BHP

325 Nm

/

Technologies

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

✓

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Okavango 2025 GK

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Collision Safety Door Latch Open System
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Number of Airbags
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking
  • G318 Standard

    Review Comparison

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Positive

    • No data found

    Negative

    • No data found

    Related comparisons

    Editor's PickOkavango 2025 GK

    Expert / Editor Recommendation

    Choose Okavango 2025 GK if you care more about price; choose G318 Standard if you care more about fuel economy.

    Popular Car Comparisons

    Geely | Okavango 2025 GK

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q2 2022 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)

    Geely | Okavango 2025 GK

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q2 2021 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)

    Geely | Okavango 2025 GK

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q2 2020 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)

    Geely | Okavango 2025 GK

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q2 2019 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)

    Geely | Okavango 2025 GK

    VS

    Audi | Audi Q2 2018 30 TFSI Basic (116 HP)

    Q&A

    • According to fuel consumption data, Okavango 2025 GK has a fuel consumption of 10, while G318 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.13. Therefore, G318 Standard is more fuel-efficient.
    • In terms of interior space, Okavango 2025 GK has a wheelbase of 2825 mm, while G318 Standard has a wheelbase of 2880. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, G318 Standard, offers more room.
    • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Okavango 2025 GK uses Front Wheel Drive, while G318 Standard uses No data.