Optima 2.4L GDI vs Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
205 km/h
161 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4855 mm
4341 mm
1860 mm
1804 mm
1465 mm
1693 mm
2805 mm
2676 mm
450 L
414 L
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
70 L
50 L
12 Km/L
17.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.6 L - 2.0 L
157 BHP - 265 BHP
105 BHP - 135 BHP
AT & Automatic
Automatic & CVT & Manual
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
2.4 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
185 BHP
115 BHP
241 Nm
156 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Optima 2.4L GDI
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Duster 1.6L PE (4x2)
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickOptima 2.4L GDI
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Optima 2.4L GDI if you care more about price; choose Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Optima 2.4L GDI has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a fuel consumption of 5.81. Therefore, Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Optima 2.4L GDI has a wheelbase of 2805 mm, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) has a wheelbase of 2676 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2.4L GDI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Optima 2.4L GDI uses Front Wheel Drive, while Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) uses Front Wheel Drive.