Optima 2.4L GDI vs EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
205 km/h
160 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4855 mm
4490 mm
1860 mm
1874 mm
1465 mm
1613 mm
2805 mm
2750 mm
450 L
/
Fuel Economy
12 Km/L
/
70 L
/
12 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
/
157 BHP - 265 BHP
153 BHP - 305 BHP
AT & Automatic
TBD
Gasoline & Petrol
Electric
TBD
/
5 Seater
5 Seater
/
TBD
/
TBD
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.4 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
185 BHP
153 BHP
241 Nm
340 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Optima 2.4L GDI
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickEHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Optima 2.4L GDI if you care more about interior space; choose EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) if you care more about overall equipment.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Optima 2.4L GDI has a fuel consumption of 8.33, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Optima 2.4L GDI has a wheelbase of 2805 mm, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2.4L GDI, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Optima 2.4L GDI uses Front Wheel Drive, while EHS3 EV 153 hp (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.