Optima 2025 vs Tiggo 4 Pro COM Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
18
17
4905
4318
1860
1831
1445
1662
2850
2610
510
/
/
Flush Door
/
5
Fuel Economy
/
/
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Front Row Seats
/
Cloth
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
/
✓
/
Dual Front Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
AT
CVT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
235/45 R18
215/60 R17
235/45 R18
215/60 R17
Key Spec
2.0 L - 2.5 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
157 BHP - 265 BHP
111 BHP - 156
AT & Automatic
Automatic & CVT
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5 - 5
Engine
2.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
194 BHP
111 BHP
/
1.5L
Exterior
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
ECO, Normal
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Optima 2025
Tiggo 4 Pro COM
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Keyless Start
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
- EBD/CBC
- EBA/BA
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 4 Pro COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Optima 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo 4 Pro COM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Optima 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Optima 2025 has a wheelbase of 2850, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM has a wheelbase of 2610. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Optima 2025 uses No data, while Tiggo 4 Pro COM uses Front Drive.