Optima 2025 vs Tiggo7 Pro Max COM Comparison
Car Information
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
18
18
4905
4500
1860
1842
1445
1746
2850
2670
510
/
/
Flush Door
/
5
Fuel Economy
/
16.6
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Manual
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
12.3
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
Transmission
AT
7DCT
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Drive
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
235/45 R18
/
235/45 R18
/
Key Spec
2.5 L
1.5 L - 1.6 L
194 BHP
197 BHP
AT
7DCT
Gasoline
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
5
Engine
2.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
194 BHP
197 BHP
/
1.6L TDGI
/
290
Exterior
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Optima 2025
Tiggo7 Pro Max COM
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Heated Side Mirrors
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Steering Adjustment
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo7 Pro Max COM
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Optima 2025 if you care more about interior space; choose Tiggo7 Pro Max COM if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Optima 2025 has a fuel consumption of No data, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a fuel consumption of 6.02. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Optima 2025 has a wheelbase of 2850, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM has a wheelbase of 2670. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Optima 2025, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Optima 2025 uses No data, while Tiggo7 Pro Max COM uses Front Drive.