OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD vs 5008 1.6T Allure plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
198 km/h
206 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4820 mm
4641 mm
1840 mm
1844 mm
1605 mm
1646 mm
2745 mm
2840 mm
options.1,801 L
952 L
Fuel Economy
13.7 Km/L
16.4 Km/L
60 L
53 L
13.7 Km/L
16.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Safety
✓
✓
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.5 L - 3.6 L
1.6 L - 1.6 L
165 BHP - 260 BHP
156 BHP - 180
Automatic & CVT
Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
6 Seater - 7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
2.5 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
172 BHP
165 BHP
235 Nm
240 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
Comparison of configuration highlights
OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
5008 1.6T Allure plus
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's Pick5008 1.6T Allure plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD if you care more about power; choose 5008 1.6T Allure plus if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.3, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus has a fuel consumption of 6.1. Therefore, 5008 1.6T Allure plus is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD has a wheelbase of 2745 mm, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus has a wheelbase of 2840 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 5008 1.6T Allure plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. OUTBACK 2.5i S AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while 5008 1.6T Allure plus uses Front Wheel Drive.