OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD vs Tiggo 9 Comfort Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
235 km/h
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7
4820 mm
4810
1840 mm
1925
1605 mm
1742
2745 mm
2800
options.1,801 L
/
/
19
Fuel Economy
10.1 Km/L
13
60 L
/
10.1 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
Driver Seat
/
10.25
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Triple
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
/
6
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
Battery/Charging
/
4
Transmission
/
AT
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2500 L
2.0
172 BHP
254
CVT
Automatic
Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
5 Seater
7
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.6 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
257 BHP
254
350 Nm
390
/
Turbocharge
/
2.0T GDI
Technologies
✓
/
/
19 ADAS Functions
/
✓
/
✓
/
Eco + Normal + Sport
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Rear Camera
- ABS
Tiggo 9 Comfort
- Power Tailgate
- Rear Defogger
- Number of Airbags
- Blind Spot Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickTiggo 9 Comfort
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD if you care more about overall equipment; choose Tiggo 9 Comfort if you care more about fuel economy.
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD has a fuel consumption of 9.9, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a fuel consumption of 7.69. Therefore, Tiggo 9 Comfort is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD has a wheelbase of 2745 mm, while Tiggo 9 Comfort has a wheelbase of 2800. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Tiggo 9 Comfort, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. OUTBACK 3.6L R-S EyeSight AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Tiggo 9 Comfort uses Front Drive.