CarteaCompare CarsOutlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline vs 300 Challenger 2.0T

Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

200 km/h

/

4

/

1998 cc

/

Chinese

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4695 mm

4760 mm

1800 mm

1930 mm

1710 mm

1927 mm

2670 mm

2750 mm

463 L

400 L

/

5 Doors

/

224 m

Fuel Economy

62.5 Km/L

10 Km/L

43 L

75 L

62.5 Km/L

10 Km/L

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Keyless Entry

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

Leather

/

Digital

/

Dual Zone

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Electric

/

/

/

Standard

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

12.3

/

/

/

/

Android LCD

/

/

9

Transmission

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four Wheel Drive

Key Spec

2.4 L

2.0 L

236 BHP

223 BHP - 342 BHP

TBD

Automatic

Hybrid

Gasoline & Hybrid

TBD

TBD

5 Seater

5 Seater

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

LED

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

2.0 L

Hybrid

Gasoline

236 BHP

224 BHP

300 Nm

387 Nm

/

In-Line

/

Single Turbo

/

4

Technologies

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • 300 Challenger 2.0T

    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear Defogger
    • Rear Power Outlet
    • Heated Side Mirrors
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Keyless Start
    • Heater
    • Rear Camera
    • Headlight On Reminder
    • Remote key types
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Lock
    • Speed Alert
    • Active braking

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's Pick300 Challenger 2.0T

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline if you care more about fuel economy; choose 300 Challenger 2.0T if you care more about price.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Toyota | Fortuner VX1 4X4

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Xpeng | G6 RWD Standard Range

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Toyota | Toyota Highlander 2022 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Toyota | Toyota Highlander 2021 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 4.0L GXR

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a fuel consumption of 1.6, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a fuel consumption of 10. Therefore, Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while 300 Challenger 2.0T has a wheelbase of 2750 mm. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, 300 Challenger 2.0T, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline uses All Wheel Drive, while 300 Challenger 2.0T uses Four Wheel Drive.