Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline vs IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD Comparison

Car Information

/

3.5

/

710

/

103

Engine / Motor

170 km/h

252

Dimensions

5 Seater

5

4695 mm

4937

1800 mm

1988

1710 mm

1671

2670 mm

2980

463 L

617–1,833 L

/

2385

/

20"

Fuel Economy

62.5 Km/L

/

43 L

/

62.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

Front and Back Row Seats

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Battery/Charging

/

/

/

30–80% in around 17 min

Transmission

/

1-speed automatic / fixed-ratio EV gearbox

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Four-Wheel Drive

/

/

AWD

/

Double wishbone independent suspension

/

Multi-link independent suspension

Wheels/brakes

/

Ventilated discs

/

Ventilated discs

/

235/50 R20

/

235/50 R20

Key Spec

2.4 L

/

236 BHP

671

TBD

1-speed automatic / fixed-ratio EV gearbox

Hybrid

Electric

TBD

/

5 Seater

5

/

TBD

/

TBD

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.4 L

/

Hybrid

Electric

236 BHP

671

300 Nm

800

Motor

/

Ternary NMC

Technologies

/

3

/

12

/

1

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • Rear Camera
    • ABS
  • IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD

    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree Camera
    • Emergency Lane Keeping (ELK)
    • Rear Cross Traffic Alert
    • Child Safety Monitoring System
    • Lane Following Assist
    • Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • Speed Sensing Auto Door Lock
    • Driver Seat Belt Warning
    • ABS
    • EBD/CBC
    • EBA/BA
    • Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
    • Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
    • Passive Pedestrian Protection
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Child Lock
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning
    • Lane Keeping Assist
    • Seat belt reminder

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickOutlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline if you care more about price; choose IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD if you care more about interior space.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Toyota | Fortuner VX1 4X4

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Xpeng | G6 RWD Standard Range

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Toyota | Toyota Highlander 2022 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Toyota | Toyota Highlander 2021 2.5L Hybrid GXR (AWD)

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline

VS

Toyota | Toyota Fortuner 4.0L GXR

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a fuel consumption of 1.6, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline has a wheelbase of 2670 mm, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD has a wheelbase of 2980. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Outlander 2.4L PHEV (S-AWD) Baseline uses All Wheel Drive, while IM Motors IM 6 BEV Ultra AWD uses Four-Wheel Drive.