Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD vs Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD Comparison

Car Information

Engine / Motor

200 km/h

192

/

4

Dimensions

7 Seater

5 Seater

4709 mm

4395

1897 mm

1795

1745 mm

1562

2705 mm

2655

331 L

430

Fuel Economy

13.9 Km/L

16.7

55 L

48

13.9 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

All Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

/

Wheels/brakes

/

/

/

/

Key Spec

2.4 L - 3.0 L

2.0 L - 2.0 L

165 BHP - 236 BHP

153 HP - 155 BHP

Automatic & CVT

6 Sp SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic

Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol

Gasoline & Petrol

TBD

TBD

5 - 7

5 - 5

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.5 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

181 BHP

155 BHP

245 Nm

200

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Comparison of configuration highlights

  • Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD

    • 360 Degree camera
    • Parking sensor rear
    • Parking sensor front
    • ABS
  • Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD

    • Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
    • Electronic engine immobilizer
    • Power Tailgate
    • 360 Degree camera
    • Rear AC Controls
    • Electric Curtain - Rear
    • Push Button Start
    • Temperature Display
    • Keyless Entry
    • Welcome Light
    • Seats - Comfort
    • Rear Camera
    • Steering Adjustment
    • Anti-Theft Alarm System
    • Runflat Tyres
    • Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
    • Door Reflectors
    • Electric anti-dazzling room mirror
    • Tire Repair Kit
    • Security System
    • Pedestrian airbag
    • First Aid Kit
    • Fire Extinguisher
    • Door Edge Protector
    • Crosswind Assist
    • Active Understeer Control (AUC)
    • Active Bonnet
    • Acceleration Skid Control
    • Collision Detection
    • Knee Bag - Driver
    • Speed Limiter
    • Auto Door Lock
    • Spare Wheel
    • Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
    • Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
    • EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
    • ABS
    • Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
    • Active braking
    • Lane Departure Warning

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Spacious interior space
  • Integrated specifications
  • Competitive price value

Negative

  • Engine performance is moderate
  • Limited driving experience
  • Traditional interior design

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Related comparisons

Editor's PickMazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD

Expert / Editor Recommendation

Choose Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD if you care more about fuel economy.

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD

VS

Haval | H7 Top 2026

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD

VS

Honda | CRV EX Full Option (AWD)

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD

VS

Honda | ZRV LX 1.5L

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD

VS

BYD | Song Plus Design

Mitsubishi | Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD

VS

Chery | Tiggo 9 Comfort

Q&A

  • According to fuel consumption data, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a fuel consumption of 5.99. Therefore, Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD is more fuel-efficient.
  • In terms of interior space, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD has a wheelbase of 2705 mm, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD has a wheelbase of 2655. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD, offers more room.
  • Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX-30 2024 2.0L Core 2WD uses Front Wheel Drive.