Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD vs Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
/
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
4709 mm
5100
1897 mm
1994
1745 mm
1756
2705 mm
3010
331 L
566
Fuel Economy
13.9 Km/L
9.1
55 L
/
13.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.0 L
3.3 L - 3.3 L
165 BHP - 236 BHP
340 HP - 345 BHP
Automatic & CVT
8 SPEED SKYACTIV WITH Mi-DRIVE & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7
6 - 8
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
181 BHP
345 BHP
245 Nm
500
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus
- 360 Degree camera
- Rear AC Controls
- Push Button Start
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Tire Repair Kit
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Crosswind Assist
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus if you care more about interior space.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a fuel consumption of 10.99. Therefore, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD has a wheelbase of 2705 mm, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus has a wheelbase of 3010. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX-90 2024 3.3L High Plus uses All Wheel Drive.