Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD vs Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
190
/
4
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4709 mm
4.275
1897 mm
1.765
1745 mm
1.535
2705 mm
2.570
331 L
240
/
✓
Fuel Economy
13.9 Km/L
15.4
55 L
48
13.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.0 L
2.0 L - 2.0 L
165 BHP - 236 BHP
145 BHP - 148 BHP
Automatic & CVT
6 Speed SkyActiv with Sports Mode & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 - 7
5 - 5
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Petrol
181 BHP
148 BHP
245 Nm
192
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Rear Defogger
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Welcome Light
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Number of Airbags
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Vehicle Stability System (ESP/DSC, etc.)
- Child Seat Interface (ISOFIX)
- Active braking
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickMazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD)
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD if you care more about interior space; choose Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) if you care more about fuel economy.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a fuel consumption of 6.49. Therefore, Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD has a wheelbase of 2705 mm, while Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) has a wheelbase of 2.570. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX3 2024 Mazda CX 3 2024 2.0L GS (FWD) uses Front Wheel Drive.