Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD vs Mazda CX60 2024 Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD Comparison
Car Information
/
/
6.8
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
/
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4709 mm
4.745
1897 mm
1.890
1745 mm
1.687
2705 mm
2.870
331 L
/
/
✓
Fuel Economy
13.9 Km/L
13.5
55 L
58
13.9 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
/
✓
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.0 L
3.3 L - 3.3 L
165 BHP - 236 BHP
280 HP - 284 BHP
Automatic & CVT
8 SPEED SKYACTIV® WITH Mi-DRIVE & 8-speed Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Hybrid
TBD
TBD
5 - 7
5 - 7 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Petrol
181 BHP
280 BHP
245 Nm
450
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
Mazda CX60 2024 Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- Electronic Engine Immobilizer
- Power Tailgate
- 360 Degree Camera
- Push Button Start
- Temperature Display
- Keyless Entry
- Rear Camera
- Steering Adjustment
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Advanced Air Bags System (AABS)
- Security System
- Pedestrian airbag
- Fire Extinguisher
- Active Understeer Control (AUC)
- Collision Detection
- Blind Spot Warning
- Speed Limiter
- Auto Door Lock
- Spare Wheel
- Door Mirrors with Side Turn Signal
- Vehicle Stability Control (VSC)
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- EBD (Electronic Brakeforce Distribution)
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
- Active braking
- Lane Departure Warning
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD if you care more about fuel economy; choose Mazda CX60 2024 Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.19, while Mazda CX60 2024 Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a fuel consumption of 7.41. Therefore, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD has a wheelbase of 2705 mm, while Mazda CX60 2024 Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD has a wheelbase of 2.870. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Outlander 2.5L GLX High Line AWD uses All Wheel Drive, while Mazda CX60 2024 Mazda CX-60 2024 3.3L e-Skyactiv-G V6 AWD uses All Wheel Drive.