Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line vs CX5 Entry Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210 km/h
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
4709 mm
4550
1897 mm
1840
1745 mm
1675
2705 mm
2700
331 L
965
/
17
Fuel Economy
14.7 Km/L
/
55 L
56
14.7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
/
6
Infotainment
/
✓
Transmission
/
6-Speed Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
Key Spec
2.4 L - 3.0 L
1.9 L - 2.5 L
165 BHP - 236 BHP
151 BHP - 190 BHP
Automatic & CVT
6-Speed Automatic & Automatic
Gasoline & Hybrid & Petrol
Gasoline & Petrol
TBD
TBD
5 Seater - 7 Seater
5 Seater
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
181 BHP
190 BHP
245 Nm
251 Nm
Technologies
/
✓
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line
- 360 Degree camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- ABS
CX5 Entry
- Parking sensor rear
- Rear Camera
- Number of Airbags
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickCX5 Entry
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line if you care more about interior space; choose CX5 Entry if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a fuel consumption of 6.8, while CX5 Entry has a fuel consumption of No data. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line has a wheelbase of 2705 mm, while CX5 Entry has a wheelbase of 2700. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line uses Front Wheel Drive, while CX5 Entry uses Front Drive.