Panel Van H/R DX 2.5 AT 3S 4-Door-copy vs DFSK C35 Standard Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
140
4
/
2490 cc
1499
GCC
/
Dimensions
3 Seater
2
4 Doors
/
5230 mm
4500
1880 mm
1680
2285 mm
1985
2940 mm
3050
195 mm
/
/
14"
/
800
Fuel Economy
65 L
55L
9 Km/L
/
/
15.5
Safety
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic CVTS
5MT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
Rear Drive
/
Macpherson independent suspension
/
MacPherson 5 Leaf Springs Non-Independent Suspension
Wheels/brakes
/
Disc
/
Drum
/
185/80R14
/
185/80R14
Key Spec
2.5 L - 2.5 L
1.5
147 BHP - 147 BHP
114
Automatic & Automatic CVTS & Manual & Manual CVTS
5MT
Petrol & Gasoline & Petrol
Gasoline
TBD
TBD
3 Seater - 15 Seater
2
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
1.5
Petrol
Gasoline
4
/
147 BHP
114
213 Nm
148
/
Naturally Aspirated
Technologies
✓
/
/
✓
Comparison of configuration highlights
Panel Van H/R DX 2.5 AT 3S 4-Door-copy
DFSK C35 Standard
- ABS
- Traction Control System (TCS / ASR, etc.)
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Panel Van H/R DX 2.5 AT 3S 4-Door-copy if you care more about power; choose DFSK C35 Standard if you care more about price.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Panel Van H/R DX 2.5 AT 3S 4-Door-copy has a fuel consumption of No data, while DFSK C35 Standard has a fuel consumption of 6.45. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Panel Van H/R DX 2.5 AT 3S 4-Door-copy has a wheelbase of 2940 mm , while DFSK C35 Standard has a wheelbase of 3050. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, DFSK C35 Standard, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Panel Van H/R DX 2.5 AT 3S 4-Door-copy uses Rear Wheel Drive , while DFSK C35 Standard uses Rear Drive.