Partner vs Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT Comparison
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
43 L
Dimensions
2
2 Seater
4401
4045 mm
1848
1665 mm
1796
1930 mm
2785
/
3.8
options.4,050 L
/
050 L
Fuel Economy
/
14.3 Km/L
/
43 L
/
14.3 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Manual
Chassis & Steering
/
Rear Wheel Drive
Key Spec
0.0 L - 1.6 L
1.5 L - 1.5 L
92 BHP - 136 BHP
96 BHP - 96 BHP
Automatic & Manual
4-Speed Automatic & 4-Speed Automatic Transmission & 5-Speed Manual Transmission & Manual
Electric & Gasoline & Petrol
Petrol & Gasoline
TBD
TBD
2 - 3 Seater
2 Seater - 2 Seater
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.2
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
100
96 BHP
74
/
3750
/
200
134 Nm
1750
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Motor
/
134 Nm
Comparison of configuration highlights
Partner
- Audio Controls on Steering Wheel
- 360 Degree Camera
- Parking sensor rear
- Parking sensor front
- Anti-Theft Alarm System
- Driving Recorder
- Parking Sensors - Front and Rear
- ABS
Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT
- 360 Degree camera
- ABS
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Related comparisons
Editor's PickPartner
Expert / Editor Recommendation
Choose Partner if you care more about price; choose Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT if you care more about power.
Popular Car Comparisons
Q&A
- According to fuel consumption data, Partner has a fuel consumption of No data, while Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT has a fuel consumption of 6.99. Therefore, No data is more fuel-efficient.
- In terms of interior space, Partner has a wheelbase of 2785, while Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT has a wheelbase of No data. Generally, the model with the longer wheelbase, No data, offers more room.
- Check drive type, ground clearance and torque together. Partner uses No data, while Lite Ace 1.5L GL MT uses Rear Wheel Drive.